Click here to join
our email and news letter list.
Never Forget 343
Gave It All On
9-11-2001
|
 |
|
Assistance
to Firefighter Grant Program (AFGP)
AFG
Help
Desk 1-866-274-0960
or firegrants@dhs.gov
FEMA Region V Help
Don
Mobley
Fire
Program Specialist
DHS/FEMA
Region 5
536
S. Clark Street, 6th Floor
Chicago,
IL 60605
312-408-5540
(Office)
(202)
309-8684 (cell)
Donald.Mobley@dhs.gov
CAUTION
- Do not use brand
names, model numbers or part numbers in your application!
2010
application
period opens April 26th and runs until May
28th.
The
application period is scheduled to begin on
Monday, April 26, 2010,
at 8:00 a.m. Eastern Time (ET). Applications for these grants must be
received by Friday, May 28, 2010, at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time (ET).
National
Preparedness Guidelines - September
2007
DHS expects its
first responder partners to be familiar with these national
preparedness guidelines and to consider these guidelines when assessing
their needs and developing their grant requests.
The
closeout part of
the application web site is down and will not be back online until
early May. This will not be held against you if you need to do a
close out.
9) Do you
have any previous
AFG grants that are past
their period of performance and have not been closed out?
(Performance on
prior awards is taken into consideration when processing new
applications. Closing out overdue AFG grants may further
facilitate
processing of your FY2009 application).
ANSWER: Yes but we have
completed our obligations and are waiting for your close out software
to
be fixed so we can close out or 2008 award.
New For
2010 in the AFG
Program
Modifications to Facilities
- Activities involving modifications to facilities are
subject to
all applicable environmental and historic preservation requirements.
- Applicants seeking assistance to modify their facilities
may
undergo additional screening.
- DHS is required to ascertain to what degree the proposed
modifications to fire stations or facilities might affect an
applicant’s structures relative to the National Environmental Policy
Act; National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended; National
Flood Insurance Program regulations; and, any other applicable laws and
Executive Orders.
- No project can proceed – except for project planning –
prior to
formal DHS approval. Noncompliance with this provision may
jeopardize
an applicant’s award and subsequent funding.
- Note: AFG does not fund modifications to facilities built
after
2003.
Vehicle Payments
- As required in the two previous grant years, FY 2010 AFG
vehicle
awardees are required to obtain a advanced payment bond IF the grantee
advances funds to a manufacturer.
- Also, the grantee must include in their vehicle purchase
contract
specific performance requirements and penalties for noncompliance with
the requirements.
Changes
in 2010 EMS Application
- They have added EMS billing to the budget.
- For Characteristics II, we now ask how many
ambulances.
|
 |
Advance payment bonds are a
requirement for vehicle grants. What are advance payment bonds and
where can I get one? |
|
|
|
An advance payment bond is like an insurance policy
that protects you in the event the manufacturer with whom you
contracted to build your vehicle cannot fulfill the contract, i.e. ,
cannot finish building your vehicle for any reason. An advance payment
bond is a financial tool used to guarantee, in the event of
manufacturer/contractor default, funds will be available to finish the
construction of your vehicle and ensure its proper operation. From the
vehicle grantee's point of view, the insolvency of a contractor during
the construction of a vehicle would most likely result in delayed
completion of the vehicle, additional expenses for a different
manufacturer/contractor to finish the work or even loss of grant funds.
For this reason, we require manufacturers/contractors to provide a bond
from an independent bank, insurance company or bonding agency so the
vehicle grantees can recover damages they may sustain if the
manufacturer/contractors default during the construction of a vehicle.
The amount of the bond should be equal to, or greater than, the sum of
any payments, compensation and/or consideration provided prior to the
delivery of the vehicle.
While the AFG Program Office does not encourage advancing funds for any
goods or services not received, if a down payment is required and you
intend to request federal funds for a down payment, an advance payment
bond is required. A copy of the advance payment bond and a copy of your
contract must be submitted to the Program Office prior to your request
for federal funds. If you intend to use your own funds for a down
payment, the Program Office strongly encourages you to get an advance
payment bond to ensure your down payment. |
|
|
 |
What is the suggested timeline
for purchasing a vehicle? |
|
|
|
The Program Office recommends the following timeline
for vehicle purchases:
- 0-30-60 days
Award is received, and specifications are updated or created. Any cost
share funds requiring approval from a municipality, council, board,
etc. should be addressed. Bear in mind matching funds are not required
by the AFG until the end of your period of performance, so you are
encouraged to move forward with your grant activities.
- 30-60 days
Specifications are approved, and the request for bids is published.
- 75-90 days
Bids are reviewed, and the vendor is selected.
- 90 days
The contract has been signed, and the performance bond obtained.
- 180 days
Semi-annual performance report is due.
- 365 days
Vehicle is delivered.
- 366 days
The final performance report is due.
|
|
|
 |
What are the grantee requirements
for purchasing a vehicle? |
|
|
|
Grantee must have an Advance Payment Bond if they are
advancing any program funds to the manufacturer. Prior to payment, the
Program Office requires faxed or e-mailed copies of: the penalty
clause, minimum $100 per day; a copy of the contract with delivery date
of vehicle; and a copy of advanced payment bond. |
|
|
 |
What is considered poor
performance on a vehicle grant, and what are the consequences of poor
performance? |
|
|
|
Poor performance is defined as an insufficient
attempt to complete the statement of work within the period of
performance. It could result in a possible loss of grant funding. The
penalty is $100 off the total award or final cost of the vehicle
(whichever is less) every day past the period of performance if the
vehicle is not delivered. |
|
|
 |
What if I have excess funds from
my vehicle grant? |
|
|
|
There is no $5000 limit on the amount of excess funds
from your vehicle award. Funds may be used for driver training
compliant with NFPA 1002 or equivalent. They may also be used to
purchase NFPA 1901 or 1906 compliant equipment, specific to the vehicle
purchased. Use of excess funds for Fire Prevention and Safety
activities, Wellness and Fitness activities, or training (excluding
driver/operator training) would require an amendment. If you have
additional questions about the use of excess funds, call the AFG Help
Desk at 1-866-274-0960. |
|
|
|
[Top]
Comprehensive Driver Program -
Information
on how to comply.
The
Assistance to Firefighter Grant (AFG) program requires a comprehensive
driver training program if you are awarded a
vehicle. This document will provide guidance as how you can comply.
[Top]
Workshop Notes and Handouts
- Marked Up 2010
Program Guidance Document
This copy has been marked showing the priorities and also warning areas
in various colors to bring attention to the important parts. Green for
highest priorities, yellow for not so good items and red for lowest
points. Orange for warnings.
Play pre-record
sessions on the various
parts of the AFG application.
- Workshop
Handouts - PowerPoint
3 Screen (PDF File: 2.4 MB)
- Workshop
Handouts - What's
New in 2010 Plus Vehicle
- Click here
- Workshop
Handouts - Scoring
- Workshop
Handouts - NFPA 1500 Chapter 6
- Vehicle
Items
- NFPA 1901 says you have to have what? March 30, 2010 - read
more
- Apparatus Purchasing: Beware of Outside Influences Feb 1, 2010 - read
more
- Making Apparatus Specs Clear, Concise, and Consistent Jun 1, 2009 - read
more
- Apparatus Specifications: Avoiding the Pitfalls Feb 1, 2008 - read
more
- A
Good “Boilerplate” Can Help Keep Your Apparatus Purchase From Becoming
A Time Bomb! Jun 1, 2006 - read
more
|
AFG
Grants Program Guidance Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Click here - Get your question
answered directly by AFGP staff
[Top]
General
Information Needed For Application
Standards
and Laws
- General
Duty
Clause (Minnesota
Statute 182.653 Subd. 2)
- Click
here
- MN Law Requiring Two
Apparatuses 069.11Sub(4) f. - Click here
- NOTE: This law
pertains to qualifying for state aid.
OSHA & NIOSH
3rd Party Gap Analysis and
Statistical Data
- Insurance Service
Organization (ISO) - Click here
- League of Minnesota Cities
Insurance Trust LMCIT - Trends
in Firefighter
Injuries Report - The following is a summary of
findings from a recent LMCIT study of
firefighter injuries in Minnesota. LMCIT is still considering options
for publishing a full report and possible injury prevention techniques.
More information on the study will be presented at LMCIT's annual loss
control workshops, located around the state in March and April
(there's
a fire track as part of the workshops this year). Registration is open
at www.lmnc.org.
Questions on the study or findings can be directed to Ann Gergen, LMCIT
Associate Administrator, at 651-281-1291 or agergen@lmnc.org.
- LMCIT’s
firefighter injury evaluation
includes data from 290 lost-time firefighter work comp claims from
injuries that
occurred between 2002 and 2006, excluding
high-cost claims exceeding $50,000 (there are so few of these
claims and
the dollar amount is so great, including them would skew the findings). Claims included in this analysis had a total
incurred value of approximately $10.1 million. Previous
LMCIT research showed no significant
differences in
injuries based on firefighter status as full-time, paid-on-call, or
volunteer. Costs and claims from all
firefighters have been combined for purposes of our analysis.
[Top]
- List of National
Fire Protection Association (NFPA)
Standards - Click
here
- NFPA 1901 Ch 5 Minimum equipment on engines/pumpers - Click here
- NFPA 1901 Ch 9 Minimum equipment on quints - Click here
- NFPA 1901 Ch 7 Minimum equipment on tenders - Click here
- NFPA 1901 Ch 8 Minimum equipment on aerials - Click here
- NFPA 1906 Ch 5 Vehicle requirements for wildland
vehicles - Click
here
- NFPA 1906 Ch 10 Minimum equipment on wildland
vehicles - Click
here
- Vehicle
Awardees Must Comply with NFPA 1500 - read more
- NFPA has
made all of their standards available on-line (with or without NFPA
membership). You can view the standard(s) but you cannot print,
download, or "cut & paste" the language. Here is how it works: Go to:http://www.nfpa.org/aboutthecodes/list_of_codes_and_standards.asp
Select the
document you want to review. Scroll down to the heading "Additional information about
this document" and click on the link "Preview this document".
Click on "I
agree".
[Top]
Federal
Requirements
- Get a D&B D-U-N-S
Number - Click
here
-
As of October 2003, departments applying for Federal
grant programs must have a D-U-N-S number.
To
apply for a federal grant program, you will need to apply for a
D-U-N-S® number. As of October 2003, departments applying for
Federal
grant programs must have a D-U-N-S® number. The Federal government
uses
the D-U-N-S® number to identify organizations that are applying for
grant funding and to provide consistent name and address data for
electronic grant applications. D-U-N-S® numbers are issued by the
Dun
& Bradstreet Corporation. To apply for a D-U-N-S® number for
your
organization, complete the online application at: www.dnb.com
- Your Fire Departments
Identification Number FDID Number
- Your Fire Departments
Identification Number (FDID is the
same as NFIRS) FDID Number
[Top]
Statewide
Radio
Coordination Board and Plan - Click
here
Scott
Wiggins
MN Department of Public Safety
ARMER Program Director
Scott.Wiggins@state.mn.us
651-201-7546
Scott Wiggins started his professional career as a radio
announcer in northern Wisconsin. As host of a morning variety
show Scott’s passion for informing the public about legislative
activity landed him a policy making role in the Wisconsin
capitol. Since Scott moved back to Minnesota in 1999, he has
worked for the Minnesota House of Representatives, as Director of
Government Relations and Strategic Planning for the Department of
Public Safety and twice for Governor Pawlenty, most recently in 2007 as
his Senior Policy Advisory for public safety, corrections and the
judicial system. In addition to his radio broadcasting degree, in
2005 Scott graduated Summa Cum Laude from the College of Saint
Scholastica with a degree in Business Management. In July of
2007, Scott became the Director of the Division of Emergency
Communication Networks at the Department of Public Safety, where he
oversees the ARMER, Interoperability and 911 Programs.
Tom Johnson
Statewide Interoperability Coordinator, DPS DECN:
MN Department of Public Safety
444 Cedar Street, Suite 137
St. Paul, MN 55101
Ofc. (651) 201-7552
tom.m.johnson@state.mn.us
Tom Johnson is currently serving as the Statewide
Interoperability Program Manager for the State of Minnesota. He
has held this position since October of 2007. Prior to working
for the State of Minnesota Tom was Chief of Police in Columbia Heights,
Minnesota for twelve years. As Chief of Police Tom oversaw many
projects including his department’s migration to the 800 MHz ARMER
system. He also served on the Anoka County Joint Law Enforcement
Council 800 MHz committee which converted Anoka County Law Enforcement,
Fire and EMS to the ARMER system. Tom’s Law Enforcement Career
had a span of 30 plus years serving on four different Minnesota Law
Enforcement Agencies.
Regional Coordinators
William "Bill" Bernhjelm
ARMER Statewide Radio Board
Northern Regional Interoperability
Coordinators (RIC)
218 349-3531
William.Bernhjelm@state.mn.us
Tom Justin
ARMER Statewide Radio Board
Central Regional Interoperability
Coordinators (RIC)
320-980-5259
Tom.Justin@state.mn.us
Steve Borchardt
ARMER Statewide Radio Board
Southern Regional Interoperability
Coordinators (RIC)
(507) 398-9687
Steven.Borchardt@state.mn.us
Statewide
Communication Interoperability Plan "SCIP"
*Regional
SCIP Presentation
*Homeland
Security - SAFECOM Criteria
*Q
& A
By asking for communications equipment
you will be coming into statutory compliance with the following state
laws; MN Law 182.653 for one and MN Law 403.36 STATEWIDE RADIO BOARD.
Subd. 1e. and Minnesota State Law 403.911 (emergency services
communications systems), and the upcoming mandatory Federal
narrowbanding requirement.
What
is Required for P25
Compliance?
At
a minimum, a P25 radio system must provide interoperability with
these two mandatory P25 Standard interface components:
- The Common Air Interface (CAI)
- The Improved Multi-Band Excitation (IMBE) vocoder
The
CAI enables P25 radios to interoperate and communicate digitally across
P25 networks and directly. This portion of the P25 standard suite was
selected to meet the unique radio system needs of the public safety
environment; coverage reliability, system design flexibility, and
inter-vendor compatibility.
The IMBE vocoder sets a uniform standard for converting speech into the
digital bitstream. IMBE was selected as the coding scheme most
successful at making male and female voices audible against background
noises such as moving vehicles, sirens, gunshots, and traffic noise –
the conditions of public safety use.
These two components, when used together enable P25 users to
interoperate and communicate digitally directly between units and
across networks, agencies, and vendors.
P25 has also defined standard modes of operation to enable multi-vendor
interoperability for additional system functions: trunking, encryption,
over-the-air rekeying, to name a few.
Project 25 also continues to develop a set of defined system interfaces
allow the P25 system elements to communicate with host computers, data
terminals and the public switched telephone network (PSTN). These
interfaces are critical to assure that P25 systems maintain
compatibility with the evolving telecommunications and
data-communications world.
http://www.project25.org/index.php
Application
Screens
[Top]
Critical Infrastructure
Does
your organization protect
critical infrastructure of
the state? YES
AS
OF 2009 ALL MN
COUNTIES HAVE CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE - HSEM
[Top]
Narrative
Tips
- For Specific Tips To
Match Questions (Important)
- Click
here
- Sample Winning Narratives
From The Idea Bank - Click here
[Top]
Grant Writers and Grant Writing
[Top]
The Panel
Review Process
[Top]
- AFGP Awards to
Minnesota Fire Departments - 2009
- AFGP Awards to
Minnesota Fire Departments - 2008
- AFGP Awards to
Minnesota Fire Departments - 2007
- AFGP Awards to
Minnesota Fire Departments - 2006
- AFGP Awards to
Minnesota Fire Departments - 2005
- AFGP Awards to
Minnesota Fire Departments - 2004
- AFGP Awards to
Minnesota Fire Departments - 2003
- AFGP Awards to
Minnesota Fire Departments - 2002
- AFGP Awards to
Minnesota Fire Departments - 2001
[Top]
The
person who
makes it all work
[Top]
How
Long Should It take To Sign An Apparatus Contract?
- Additional
Vehicle Items
- Workshop
Handouts - What's
New in 2010 Plus Vehicle
- Click here
- NFPA
1901 says you have to have what? March 30, 2010 - read
more
- Apparatus
Purchasing: Beware of Outside Influences Feb 1, 2010 - read
more
- Making
Apparatus Specs Clear, Concise, and Consistent Jun 1, 2009 - read
more
- Apparatus
Specifications: Avoiding the Pitfalls Feb 1, 2008 - read
more
- A Good “Boilerplate”
Can Help Keep Your Apparatus Purchase From Becoming A Time Bomb! Jun 1, 2006 - read
more
AFG Staff Responds
We recognize that
normal build times for custom/semi-custom fire apparatus is 270 to 360
days depending on the type of vehicle and the various specifications
included in the vehicle.
We also recognize
that the Federal government requires open and fair competition which
can take 30 to 60 days. Given these two ‘givens’, it is not
always possible to have a vehicle purchased and delivered within the
12-month performance period provided with the grants. BUT, there
is very little excuse for not completing the project within 15
months.
We are willing to
work with grantees that need the extra three months IF the grantee does
everything in their power to assure that the project is completed in
the most expeditious manner.
We see no reason
why a vehicle grantee couldn’t meet the following schedule:
develop specs and advertise their purchase within the first 30 days of
the performance period; receive and evaluate bid proposals within 60
days; and, sign a contract for purchase within 90 days.
In the past,
we’ve heard the excuses like, “We’ve never had the opportunity to buy a
new vehicle before, so we wanted to make sure the vehicle meets all of
our needs.” But wrestling over the placement of the chrome bell
shouldn’t take the entire 12-month performance period.
All awards are
made on the premise of urgency, i.e., based on claims that if the
applicant doesn’t replace this vehicle immediately, lives will be
lost.
If a grantee has
the luxury of delaying action on their vehicle award, then we believe
we have reasonable doubt about any statements in their application
regarding the urgency.
If a grantee
doesn’t get a signed contract within 90 days, they should hope that
their build time is relatively short.
Currently,
grantees that seek extensions to their period of performance when
little or nothing has been done during the original POP are being
denied and the grantee is being instructed to find a commercial vehicle
that fits their scope of work.
[Top]
Legislation
Affecting the AFG
Program
Internet Site for
the OMB budget documents
follows:
Click
here
to join our email and news letter list.
[Top]
|